TraditionalMountaineering Logo - representing the shared 
companionship of the Climb

Home | Information | Photos | Calendar | News | Seminars | Experiences | Questions | Updates | Books | Conditions | Links | Search

  Search this site!
Read more:

Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho) questions Fee Demo

Fees, forests don't always fit
By Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho
July 24, 2004

for "Writers on the Range"

The next time you visit your local public library, drive an interstate highway through the West or attend a city council meeting, imagine how frustrated and upset you'd be if you were charged a fee for the privilege of doing so. In spite of the tax dollars you already pay to support these entities, imagine if you were charged an extra "user fee" or "admission fee."

Managers might assure you that the fee will go toward more helpful signs on the road, more comfortable chairs at city hall or a refreshment stand in the library. These amenities might improve your experience while providing extra funding for these institutions. If, after a year or two of paying these fees, some of the promised services materialized and some didn't, you would rightfully feel used, confused or angry.

Rest assured, highways, libraries and city halls won't be subject to fees like this in the foreseeable future. Across the nation, however, some of our public lands already are.

The authority to charge a recreation fee is provided to the agencies under the Recreation Fee Demonstration Program, which is set to expire in December 2005 unless Congress votes another reauthorization. This program has provided us all with insight into what we like, dislike and are willing to pay for when it comes to using our public lands.

What I have heard overwhelmingly is that people around the country are willing to pay for a service associated with actual use, but not simple access to our public lands. I agree with this and have no problem with charging users a recreation fee - or, more accurately, an amenity fee - for the maintenance or related costs of areas with a Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management campground, a public access boat ramp, garbage pickup or other such services.

But I do not agree with charging users a fee to hunt, fish, hike or otherwise use unimproved public lands.

We pay to see a movie or concert in a public place; we might pay to enter a museum. Sometimes, we pay a toll to finance roads or bridges.

In each instance, we pay for a finished product, something that has taken time and money to build or create, or that will require funding to maintain. I cannot support the policy of charging people fees to access lands and resources that are already theirs, which certainly were not created or upgraded by the natural resource agencies, and which won't be improved or altered as a result of these fees.

In the case of a town or county that imposes a user fee for something like a library, the citizens can use the ballot box to resolve their concerns about administrators who overstep their responsibilities or the bounds of common sense. In the case of the land managers who work for federal agencies, there are no elections. That is why I am calling for recreation fee advisory committees in each state to review and advise where and what fees should be charged.

I am also concerned that during the six-year Recreation Fee Demonstration, we relieved the federal agencies from having to count these fees as part of their gross receipts, which are shared with the counties through programs like the Forest Service's 25 percent Payment to Counties.

Now that the demonstration is coming to an end and we are trying to determine if and how to provide permanent authority to the program, we must also look at how recreation affects the counties that host our public lands. Improved amenities will bring more recreation, and as a result, increased pressure on counties. I will demand that all fees collected from this and other programs continue to be shared with county and local governments.

Larry Craig is a Republican senator from Idaho. Writers on the Range is a service of High Country News in Paonia.
All contents Copyright 2004 The Denver Post or other copyright holders. All rights reserved.




Read more . . .

  Fee Demo and Climbing Fees
Fee demo program discriminates against our poor folks

Fee Demo looses to grass roots outrage
Fee Demo Forest Pass dropped at 20 sites on the Deschutes National Forest! 
Senator Regula's Fee Demo support and The Wilderness Center, Inc.
Senator Craig calls Fee Demo a failed program
Outdoor recreation in Oregon far from free 
Oregon Field Guide: “Pay to Play on Public Land”  

National Park Service plans climbing fees increase! 
Fee demo rejected by USFS employees 
Fee demo has "fallen short" - Senator Craig 
Fee demo demonstrations 

  The Badlands Wilderness
New pole shows Badlands Wilderness favored by voters
BLM posts Reward for information on Juniper rustlers
BLM weighing public input on management plan
Oregon's Badlands hit by old growth Juniper rustlers  Photos
Congressman Greg Walden to visit The Badlands
Badlands Wilderness endorsed by COTA
OpEd - Unregulated OHV use is being reviewed across the western states
OHV use curtailed by new USFS policy decisions 
Sierra Club's Juniper Group supports Badlands Wilderness 
OHV regulation discussed at BLM meeting in Bend, Oregon
OpEd - Badlands part of BLM's recreation management area
OpEd - We need the Badlands Wilderness 
OpEd - Off-roaders have no reason to fear Badlands Wilderness designation
Speak for the Badlands at Town Hall Meeting 
Hiking poles are becoming essential gear 
Vandals destroy ancient pictographs in the Badlands
Senator Wyden tests support of Badlands Wilderness
Badlands Wilderness endorsed by Bend City Commissioners
The Badlands: proposed for Wilderness status

The Badlands, a brief history  
The Badlands pictographs reported 75 year ago

Map of huge exclusive OHV areas adjoining the Badlands